Draft – Internal Use
Market Intelligence Cell (MIC)
Cherry Market Stability Technical Report (Draft)

Apple Market Stability Technical Report (Draft)

Market Intelligence Cell (MIC) • Draft analytical pack for internal review & web publication.

1. Executive Summary

This technical note presents a multidimensional stability assessment of apple prices across market–variety–grade segments.

The MIC Stability Index (0–100) integrates six risk dimensions—price variability (CV), short-term volatility (4-week), medium-term volatility (8-week), downside risk (maximum drawdown), shock frequency, and directional consistency—to identify structurally stable and high-risk segments.

Aglar | Kullu Delicious | A (~74) and Aglar | Delicious | A (~74) emerge as the most stable segments. In contrast, Narwal | Delicious | NoGrade (~24) is structurally the most volatile, combining the highest CV (~0.42), largest drawdown (~1.65), and elevated short-term volatility.

Key takeaway: Instability is dimension-specific. Some segments are shock-driven, others drawdown-driven, while Narwal is structurally weak across multiple dimensions—requiring segment-level advisory rather than blanket market classification.


2. Stability Ranking Summary (Top Segments)

The ranking confirms Aglar A grades and Azadpur | Delicious | A as the top stability cluster (~70–74). These segments combine low variability, contained drawdown, and controlled short-term volatility while sustaining strong mean prices (~₹47–₹58/kg).

Moderately Stable segments (40–60 range) include Nowpora B grades and Azadpur B grades, where instability is driven by either shock frequency or drawdown exposure.

Narwal | Delicious | NoGrade remains the only Highly Volatile segment (~24).

Insight: Stability varies materially across grades within the same market—grade-level monitoring is essential.


3. Stability Subscores Heatmap (Diagnostic View)

The heatmap reveals that Aglar A grades show strong performance across CV, volatility, and drawdown dimensions—explaining their high composite scores.

Moderate segments show weakness concentrated in shock frequency or drawdown rather than uniform instability.

Narwal | Delicious | NoGrade displays severe weakness in variability and drawdown scores but strong directional consistency—indicating persistent trend-driven price movement despite structural vulnerability.

Interpretation: Most unstable segments fail due to 1–2 dominant structural weaknesses rather than uniform instability across all metrics.


4. Risk Quadrant Map (Mean Price vs Short-Term Volatility)

The quadrant map separates segments by mean price and short-term volatility.

Premium + Low Volatility: Aglar A grades and Azadpur | Delicious | A combine strong price realization with contained volatility.

High Price + High Volatility: Narwal | Delicious | NoGrade shows attractive price levels (~₹46/kg) but elevated short-term volatility (~0.13).

Insight: High price does not automatically imply high risk—several premium segments remain structurally stable.


5. Structural Risk Map (Variability vs Downside Risk)

This map isolates structural exposure using CV and maximum drawdown.

Narwal | Delicious | NoGrade stands alone as the most structurally exposed segment (highest CV and highest drawdown).

Aglar | Kullu Delicious | A and Aglar | Delicious | A show the lowest structural risk (low CV, low drawdown).

Interpretation: Structural instability is highly concentrated rather than evenly distributed across markets.


6. Drivers of Instability (Component View)

The stacked decomposition highlights dominant instability contributors.

Narwal | Delicious | NoGrade shows the largest combined risk stack—driven by variability, volatility, and drawdown exposure.

Moderate segments are either shock-driven (Azadpur B grades) or drawdown-driven (Aglar B grades).

Operational Insight: Variability-driven instability supports timing advisories; drawdown-driven instability supports hedging and cautious procurement strategies.


7. Radar Profile (Top 5 vs Bottom 5 Segments)

The radar comparison illustrates multidimensional contrast.

Stable segments display wide, balanced polygons across variability, volatility, and drawdown dimensions.

Narwal | Delicious | NoGrade shows sharp contraction across structural axes with unusually high directional consistency—indicating persistent but unstable price trends.

Conclusion: Stability superiority arises from balanced strength across multiple dimensions—not dominance in a single metric.


Note on Interpretation & Updates

Scores are computed from weekly apple market records and will update as additional seasonal data is incorporated.

Stability should be interpreted alongside arrivals, quality variation, and supply-side disruptions.

Transparency: The Stability Index is a diagnostic intelligence tool for advisory and risk profiling—not a price prediction model.